Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are marginalised in Tonga. Section 136 of the Criminal Offences Act criminalises sodomy with a penalty of up to ten years imprisonment. While this provision is termed in gender-neutral language, only male homosexuality seems to be generally acknowledged in Tonga. The offenders may also be whipped as a punishment if convicted. Transgender people have a violation of rights in Tonga; Section 81(5) of the Criminal Offences Act (1988) criminalises gender nonconformity. There is no legal framework for the recognition of intersex rights.
Tonga is the only country in the Pacific that has not signed or expressed support for the 2011 Joint Statement on ending acts of violence and related human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity at the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Belize are subject to gross violations, discrimination, and stigma, though the situation, in recent times, has improved.
In August 2016, the Belize Supreme Court overturned Section 53 of the Criminal Code that criminalised same-sex conduct and acts. In 2019, the Court of Appeal denied the government’s appeal of the 2016 decriminalising ruling. LBTI people are protected from hate crimes, stigma, harassment under section 16(3) of the Constitution which prohibits discrimination on grounds of sex including sexual orientation.
However, there is no recognition of same-sex unions and marriages. Also, there is no legal framework for transgender or intersex rights in Belize.
In the 39th Session, the CEDAW Committee did not provide any LBTI-focused recommendations to Belize. The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-specific questions.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people face serious issues of violence and discrimination, including hate crimes, arbitrary arrests, extortion by members of the police force, and lack of access to services and employment in Dominica. Dominica is one of the only Commonwealth States from the Americas that supported the 2011 UN Human Rights Council Joint Statement to end acts of violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Section 14 and 16 of the Sexual Offences Act 1998 criminalises consensual same-sex sexual conduct.
Transgender people have no legal recognition, and there is no legal or policy framework for intersex people.
Overall, there is a lack of access and protection for LBTI people on marriage equality, education, hate crimes, healthcare, justice, employment. LBTI people in Dominica are also vulnerable to HIV/AIDS, and there is no policy framework that protects them from multiple marginalisation.
In the 43rd Session, the CEDAW Committee did not provide any LBTI-focused recommendations to Dominica. The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-specific questions.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Saint Lucia face legal, social and economic barriers to full inclusion and enjoyment of their human rights. The Constitution of Saint Lucia protects all individuals from violations of their personal security, freedom of expression, family life, privacy, movement, and deprivation of property, but does not include a definition of discrimination that is inclusive of sexual orientation or gender identity.
Consensual same-sex conduct and acts are criminalised in Saint Lucia, according to Section 132 (gross indecency) and 133 (buggery) of the Criminal Code No.9 (2004). Although these laws do not explicitly mention gender identity or expression, law enforcement officials often conflate gender identity with sexual orientation, and, as such, these laws are also used to criminalise gender identity and expression which strays from the assigned norm. There is no explicit recognition and protection of the rights of intersex people in Saint Lucia.
Article 131 of the Labour Code (2006) bans “unfair dismissal” based on sexual orientation. Saint Lucia adopted Rule 7(1) of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Sentencing Guidelines) Rules, 2019, that provides for the aggravation of penalties when offences are committed because of the victim’s sexual orientation.
In December 2008, Saint Lucia was the only UN member in the Americas to formally oppose the Declaration to the General Assembly that affirmed international human rights protections for sexual orientation and gender identity and condemned rights abuses against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.
The State party, during its first Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in 2011, rejected recommendations to decriminalise consensual same-sex sexual relations between adults but did accept a recommendation to condemn acts of violence against LBTI people.
In its second UPR, Saint Lucia noted the recommendations to decriminalise consensual same-sex sexual relations, which demonstrated the State party’s receptiveness towards the LBTI community, but did not commit to a comprehensive legislative change.
In the 43rd Session, the CEDAW Committee did not provide any LBTI-focused recommendations to Saint Lucia. The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-specific questions.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LBTI) people’s rights are heavily suppressed in Ghana, and therefore they face significant challenges in accessing opportunities and government services. Consensual same-sex conduct is illegal through the imposition of the Ghanian Criminal Code of 1960; Section 104 of the Code contains provisions criminalising consensual same-sex sexual acts between males. Under Section 104(1)(b) “unnatural carnal knowledge” with consent is considered a misdemeanour.
Ghana does not recognise same-sex marriages or same-sex civil unions, but voted in favour of the 2017 UN resolution that condemned countries that use the death penalty as a punishment for consensual same-sex relations. There is also no legal recognition provided to transgender people in Ghana. There is no legal policy framework for intersex people’s rights.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Ghana in 2015. The List of Issues also did not have any LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) to intensify efforts to prevent and systematically punish all forms of violence against women and girls;(b) to ensure that there is effective implementation of Domestic Violence Act, 2007 and that victims of domestic abuse have full access to protection orders and legal remedies instead of mediation;
(c) to ensure the effective implementation of the Human Trafficking Act, 2005, including through the swift adoption of enabling legislation, and addressing the root causes of trafficking amongst women and girls;
(d) to provide full access to support for victims of trafficking, including provision of alternative income opportunities and rehabilitation to women who want to “leave prostitution”;
(e) to increase access for women and girls, in particular rural women, to basic health-care services, including SRHR and safe abortion techniques.

Article 20 of the Eswatini Constitution provides for equality before the law and non-discrimination but does not prevent discrimination on the grounds of sex, language, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are extremely marginalised in Eswatini. There is no legislation in the State party that provides legal recognition to LBTI people or protects them from discrimination and stigma.
Eswatini’s perspective on same-sex conduct is governed by colonial-era common law (1907) that criminalises sodomy, defined as same-sex sexual relations between men, although there is no clear sentence specified for this offense. The situation regarding women is unclear, however, and there appear to be no specific provisions criminalising sexual relations between females. Eswatini also has the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS in the world, and therefore, it would be likely that LBTI constituencies are extremely vulnerable to infections.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Eswatini in 2014. It provided a few general recommendations that may apply to LBTI people in Eswatini.
Firstly, the Committee urged the State party to enact into law the bill on sexual offenses and domestic violence against women, especially marital rape and sexual harassment, without further delay; and to provide survivors access to psychosocial and legal support.
Secondly, the Committee also asked the State party to provide for a comprehensive HIV/AIDS response strategy that includes prevention and free antiretroviral treatment to all women living with HIV/AIDS. Thirdly, to provide safe abortion and post-abortion care services.
Lastly, the Committee urged the Eswatini to provide support to survivors of trafficking and 'prostitution' by providing them with access to shelters, legal, medical and psychosocial assistance, and alternative income-generating opportunities and stepping up efforts aimed at bilateral, regional, and international cooperation to prevent trafficking, including by exchanging information and harmonising legal procedures to prosecute traffickers, in particular with States members of the Southern African Development Community.
The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-inclusive questions.

In Sierra Leone, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are subject to abject violence, discrimination, and stigma. Section 61 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 criminalises ‘buggery and bestiality with a penalty of life imprisonment'. However, consensual same-sex relationships between women are not explicitly criminalised. The Constitution of Sierra Leone and its laws do not protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. There is no explicit framework for the rights of transgender and intersex people.
Despite these legal discrepancies, in 2011, at the UN Human Rights Council in March, Sierra Leone supported a historic Joint Statement on Ending Acts of Violence and Related Human Rights Violations Based on Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Sierra Leone in 2014. The List of Issues did not include LBTI-inclusive questions. The Committee provided the State party with some general recommendations that can also be applicable to the LBTI constituencies:
(a) to implement a comprehensive national strategy to end gender-based violence for the next five years, which would include reviewing and amending the Domestic Violence Act and criminalising marital rape;
(b) to strengthen redressal systems including the judiciary handling violence-related cases in a timely, gender-sensitive and non-discriminatory manner;
(c) to ensure that medical treatment, psychosocial rehabilitation, and legal assistance are adequately provided to victims of gender-based violence; and systematically collect data on these cases;
(d) to strengthen the capacity and resources of existing shelters for victims of trafficking and improve access to victim protection services, including counseling and legal services, for victims of trafficking, and take measures to protect vulnerable groups from trafficking;
(e) to provide assistance, rehabilitation and reintegration programmes for women and girls who are exploited in “prostitution” and provide information on the impact of economic empowerment programmes and poverty reduction programmes in increasing income-generating opportunities for women who wish to leave “prostitution”.

Article 16 of Rwanda’s Constitution protects equality under the law and prohibits discrimination on the basis of “race, color, origin, ethnic background, clan, sex, opinion, religion, or social status”. However, there is no provision in the law explicitly prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, and LBTI persons are effectively prohibited access to any legal recourse for discrimination that they face.
Currently, Rwanda does not have any laws that criminalise same-sex acts, but same-sex conduct is considered a taboo, and the Rwandan government continues its refusal to enact legislation protecting the rights of the LBTI communities.
In 2011, Rwanda became the only country in Central East Africa, and one of six countries in all of Africa to support the historic Joint Statement on Ending Acts of Violence and Related Human Rights Violations Based on Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity. Rwanda also supported a UN resolution in 2017 that condemned countries that use the death penalty as punishment for consensual same-sex relationships.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Rwanda in 2017. The List of Issues also did not include LBTI-inclusive questions. However, the Committee did provide the State party with some general observations and recommendations that could also be applicable to the LBTI constituencies:
(a) decriminalising abortion and removal of barriers for access to legal abortion, and providing women with access to good post-abortion care;
(b) strengthen measures to prevent trafficking in refugee camps;
(c) combat all forms of gender-based violence against women, including domestic and sexual violence, paying particular attention to disadvantaged groups, including for women in conflict situations.

Lesbians, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are subjected to many egregious instances of discrimination, stigma, and violence in Zambia. Zambia gained independence from Britain in 1964, and yet, some of its colonial-era laws govern LBTI people.
Section 155 of the Penal Code Act of 1995 criminalises sexual conduct that is against the order of nature, which means sexual conduct that is not between a man and a woman. This includes acts in both public and private spheres, between consenting adults (male and female). Section 157 of the Penal Code explicitly targets consensual same-sex sexual acts with the provision that criminalises “indecent practices between males”.
There is no explicit legal protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the Zambian Constitution, and Zambia does not have an explicit framework for the protection of transgender and intersex people. The Zambian government does not permit advocacy of LBTI rights, however freedom of expression has been affirmed by the courts in the People v. Paul Kasonkomona case.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Zambia in 2011. The List of Issues also did not include LBTI-inclusive questions.
The Committee provided a few general observations that may be applicable to LBTI people:
(a) to strengthen the capacity and resources of existing shelters for victims of trafficking and improve access to victim protection services, including counselling and legal services, for victims of trafficking, and take measures to protect vulnerable groups from trafficking;
(b) to pursue a comprehensive approach in addressing the question of “prostitution”, including the provision of shelters and others services such as exit or reintegration programmes for “women who wish to leave prostitution”;
(c) to provide access to free prevention, treatment and care, and support services to women living with HIV/AIDS;
(d) to take steps to investigate, prosecute and punish all perpetrators of violence against women refugees;
(e) to put in place, without delay, a comprehensive strategy to eliminate violence against women and harmful practices, and criminalise the practice of sexual cleansing.

It should also be noted that Zambia’s last attended session was ten years ago; it is possible that Zambia’s position on LBTI rights will be challenged at the international level, both by the CEDAW Committee as well as the Zambian civil society in advance of its next session.
Lesbians, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Tanzania are particularly vulnerable to various human rights violations, including but not limited to physical, sexual, and verbal abuse, arbitrary arrests and detention, denial of access to justice, eviction from housing, and unfair dismissal from places of employment — all despite the existence of a Constitution that explicitly provides protection against the aforementioned violations.
Tanzania has also orchestrated a systematic attack on the rights of LGBT people through a clampdown on the work of activists and organisations. The Penal Code of Tanzania and the Penal Decree Act of Zanzibar both criminalise “carnal knowledge against the order of nature”. However, these laws do not explicitly criminalise consensual same-sex acts between adult women.
Police continue to conduct arbitrary arrests and forced anal examinations based on sexual orientation or gender identity, and LBTI people often struggle to access and receive healthcare for HIV/AIDS infections. There is no legislation or policy that would protect or recognise the rights of transgender and intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Tanzania in 2016. The List of Issues also did not include LBTI-inclusive questions.
The Committee provided a few general observations that may be applicable to LBTI people:
(a) to raise awareness on SRHR, sexual behaviour, and reproductive and health rights at primary and secondary school levels;
(b) to reduce maternal mortality with the implementation of policy, amendment of legal provisions to regulate abortion and decriminalising it;
(c) to provide access to free prevention, treatment, and care and support services to women living with HIV/AIDS;
(d) to amend the provisions of the HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act (2008) that perpetuate discrimination against women living with HIV, including those that criminalise the transmission of HIV and force the disclosure of HIV status to sexual partners;
(e) to repeal discriminatory provisions of the Penal Code and eliminate discriminatory practices faced by female sex workers, including access to healthcare, exit programmes, and introduce measures to discourage the demand for 'prostitution'.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people face a lot of discrimination, violence, and stigma in Lesotho. Lesotho decriminalised same-sex conduct and acts in 2012; previously the erstwhile Roman-Dutch law of the Cape Colony, including sodomy laws was applied to Basutoland (as Lesotho was then known).
The current legal framework of Lesotho allows for legal gender recognition although outdated terminology, inconsistencies, and a lack of guidelines limit the ability of transgender persons to successfully apply for legal gender recognition on their identity documents. The legal environment is also very challenging for the protection of intersex rights.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Lesotho in 2011. The List of Issues also did not include LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include having a comprehensive strategy to address trafficking of women and girls which should contain access to quality medical care, counselling, financial support, adequate housing, and training opportunities, as well as free legal services; improve access to healthcare and sexual and reproductive health and rights for all women, including prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS.

It should also be noted that Lesotho’s last attended session was more than ten years ago; it is possible that Lesotho’s position on LBTI rights will be challenged at the international level, both by the CEDAW Committee as well as its civil society in advance of its next session.
Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people face many challenges in Namibia with regard to legal, social, and economic situations. In Namibia, there is no codified provision that criminalises same-sex conduct, but it remains a criminal offence under the Roman-Dutch common law in force. Same-sex acts have been defined as “unlawful and intentional sexual relations per anum between two human males”. Same-sex unions and marriages are not legally recognised.
Transgender people have legal recognition of their right to self-identify through the Births, Marriages and Deaths Registration Act 81 of 1963, which states that: “The Secretary may on the recommendation of the Secretary of Health, alter in the birth register of any person who has undergone a change of sex, the description of the sex of such person and may for this purpose call for such medical reports and institute such investigations as he may deem necessary. In addition, a transgender person who has not had a 'change of sex' could possibly use the Identification Act 2 of 1996.” Namibian intersex people do not have a concrete legal recognition framework to claim their rights.
The CEDAW Committee did not provide any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Namibia in 2015. The List of Issues also did not have any LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include ensuring specific legislative and policy measures with regard to informed and consensual sterilisation; implementing strategies to combat and prevent HIV/AIDS amongst women and girls; and providing affordable SRHR services along with abortion and post-abortion services and protection of victims of trafficking.

Consensual same-sex relations between adults are criminalised in Samoa under the Crimes Act, 2013. Though there is no legal recognition of transgender or intersex rights, they are not criminalised. In fact, in May 2013, Samoa repealed criminal provisions that prohibited males “impersonating” females. This law, the Crimes Ordinance 1961, which was repealed by the Crimes Act, 2013, was used to target transgender women and other gender-diverse people.
Samoa supported the 2011 UN Human Rights Council Joint Statement to end acts of violence based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity; and in 2016, during its second Universal Periodic Review (UPR), noted recommendations to decriminalise consensual same-sex activity between adults and to protect and prohibit discrimination against LGBT persons.
The CEDAW Committee provided no SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Samoa, despite it being the only state amongst the 54 Commonwealth States that had an LBTI-inclusive List of Issues.
The List of Issues asked the State Party to provide data on gender-based violence against LBT women and intersex people, disaggregated by sex, age, nationality, geographic location, and relationships between the victim and perpetrator; and to submit more information on the situation of certain marginalised groups of women, including LBTI people and whether specific measures have been adopted to address intersectional forms of discrimination against them.
Despite these questions raised in the List of Issues, the Committee did not provide any rights-affirming recommendations for LBTI people. One of the reasons could be that there were no LBTI-inclusive civil society submissions.

Although the Constitution of Vanuatu contains general human rights protections for all citizens irrespective of “race, place of origin, religious or traditional beliefs, political opinions, language or sex,” there is no explicit mention of sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sexual characteristics (SOGIESC). Vanuatu decriminalised same-sex sexual conduct in 2007, and it should be noted that there is very limited data on the LGBT+ population in the country, because government census data does not explicitly measure their experiences.
There is no administrative or legal procedure in Vanuatu that explicitly recognise and protects the rights of transgender people. Vanuatu also does not provide for a legal framework to recognise and protect the rights of intersex people.
Vanuatu has endorsed all UN resolutions that have a SOGIESC-focus (e.g, the UN General Assembly statement on SOGI rights as human rights (2008); the UNHRC resolution to document all discriminatory laws, practices, and acts of violence against SOGI people in member states (2011), and the UNHRC resolution to appoint an independent expert on sexual orientation and gender identity (2016)), but there is almost no national legal protection against discrimination towards LBTI people in healthcare, employment, housing, or education.
Vanuatu has not received a SOGIESC-focused recommendation from the CEDAW Committee yet. The Committee’s Concluding Observations to Vanuatu were very focused on the heteropatriarchal relationship between men and women, both in the public and private spheres.
The List of Issues and the State party’s report did not contain any SOGIESC-specific questions or commentary. A general recommendation by the Committee for women in Vanuatu on ensuring access to all mainstream health services, including sexual and reproductive health services may be applicable to all LBTI people in the country.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are vulnerable to several social and legal challenges in Kiribati. The State Party criminalises consensual same-sex acts between men, through Section 153 that criminalises “buggery” between men, with a penalty of 14 years imprisonment.
In Kiribati, employment discrimination based on “sexual orientation” is prohibited under Article 107(2)(b) of the Employment and Industrial Relations Code 2015, and this helps protect LBTI people from discrimination and stigma at the workplace. Transgender and intersex people do not have the right to legal recognition.
In 2016, Kiribati was one of two countries where consensual same-sex acts are criminalised (another one was Sri Lanka) that voted against dissolving the mandate of the UN Independent Expert on violence and discriminaiton based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The CEDAW Committee has not provided any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Kiribati yet. However, the List of Issues from July 2019 does bring up a question that is LBT-inclusive.
It was to provide information on the measures taken or planned to amend the Constitution and adopt a comprehensive anti-discrimination to guarantee substantive equality to women who face intersecting forms of discrimination, including LBT people. This question does not make a reference to intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee provided a few general recommendations to all women under the Convention, and therefore, can be read to include LBTI people.
One of these was to enforce the legal protection and mechanisms to stop the “exploitation of girls and young women in prostitution”; another was concern that abortion remains prohibited, and urged the State Party to legalise it and improve access of all women to sexual and reproductive health rights.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are subject to violence, discrimination, and stigma in Tuvalu. The State Party criminalises same sex acts between men, through Sections 153 that makes criminalises “buggery”, 154 that “attempts to commit unnatural offences and indecent assault”, and 155 that criminalises “gross indecency”.
Tuvalu, however, banned employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in 2017. Transgender and intersex people do not have the right to legal recognition.
In 2011, Tuvalu supported the UN Human Rights Council Joint Statement to end acts of violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The CEDAW Committee has not provided any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Tuvalu yet.
In the Concluding Observations, the Committee noted, with concern, that the Penal Code 1965, criminalises consensual same-sex conduct between adult men. However, no recommendations to the State party were provided by the Committee.
The List of Issues had a question on charting and indicating the progress the State had made in reviewing discriminatory laws, including the provision in the Penal Code, under which consensual same-sex sexual activity between adult men is penalised.

The Committee, in the 84th Extraordinary Session, noted its concern within the Concluding Observations but did not provide any recommendations that could be taken forward by the State Party.
There is growing support for lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex(LBTI) people in Nauru in recent years. In 2016, Nauru decriminalised consensual same-sex conduct and acts, though same-sex marriages and unions are still not legal.
Intersex and transgender people do not have explicit legal recognition or protection in Nauru. Protection from employment discrimation is also not available for LBTI people.
In 2011, Nauru supported the UN Human Rights Council Joint Statement to end acts of violence based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.
The CEDAW Committee has not provided any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Nauru yet. The Concluding Observations did not have any observations towards the situation of LBTI rights in Nauru. The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-inclusive questions.
The CEDAW Committee provided a few general recommendations to all women under the Convention, and therefore, can be read to include LBTI constituencies.
Firstly, it recommended that the State party decriminalise abortion in all cases and ensure women’s access to SRHR-based healthcare.
Secondly, it recommended that Nauru increase its efforts to address trafficking in person and exploitation of “prostitution” and raise awareness on these issues.
Thirdly, to make efforts so that women and girls have greater access to legal aid services.
Lastly, to review all existing laws regarding marriage and family laws and remove all discriminatory provisions.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) rights are not recognised within Papua New Guinea. Consensual male same-sex sexual activity is criminalised as an ‘Unnatural Offence’ in the Criminal Code Act 1974, Section 210. In this section, male same-sex activity is criminalised alongside bestiality.
Trans people do not have legal recognition of their rights within the State party, and there is no legal policy framework for the rights of intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee has not provided any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Papua New Guinea. The Concluding Observations did not have any observations towards the situation of LBTI rights in the State party. The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-inclusive questions.
The CEDAW Committee provided a few general recommendations to all women under the Convention, and therefore, can be read to include LBTI people.
The Committee recommended to the State party to prepare and adopt a legislative framework on trafficking in human beings, including the prevention of trafficking, the timely prosecution, and punishment of traffickers, the provision of protection from traffickers/agents, and quality support and programmes for victims. They were also concerned about the brutal torture and killings of women and girls, especially old women, accused of witchcraft, and how there is very little effort to investigate, and a lack of information around these deaths.
The Committee was also concerned about how only a fraction of the population has their births registered and how this may impact the legal status of women.
Lastly, the Committee noted that the State party has planned to establish a social protection policy framework for certain disadvantaged groups.

The rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are not recognised in the Solomon Islands. Section 160 and 161 of the Penal Code criminalises “buggery” and “attempt to commit unnatural offences” and 162 punishes “gross indecency” in public or private.
The Solomon Islands does not recognise same-sex unions in any form. Intersex and transgender people do not have explicit legal protection.
In its second cycle of Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the Solomon Islands rejected six recommendations regarding decriminalisation and anti-discrimination legislation inclusive of SOGIESC.
The CEDAW Committee has not provided any SOGIESC-focused recommendations to the Solomon Islands. The Concluding Observations did not have any observations towards the situation of LBTI rights in the State party.
The List of Issues also does not contain LBTI-inclusive questions. The CEDAW Committee provided a few general recommendations to all women under the Convention, and therefore, can be read to include LBTI constituencies.
The Committee urged the State party to legalise abortion and improve access of all women to sexual and reproductive health rights; provide access to justice and support towards women who are victims of trafficking, “prostitution” and gender-based violence.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Grenada face legal, social, and economic barriers to full inclusion and enjoyment of their human rights. In spite of some positive developments regionally, Grenada’s punitive laws, policies, and practices continue to contribute to pervasive stigma and discrimination, which often lead to hate crime, abuse by the police, torture, and ill-treatment, and family and community violence towards these constituencies.
The State party has a very open-ended provision - Section 431 with a penalty of ten years imprisonment, criminalising “unnatural connexion”, which has been interpreted in the past to include consensual same-sex conduct between men.
There is no legal recognition of trans identities and no place within the law for intersex people.
In 2010, during its first Universal Periodic Review (UPR) cycle, Grenada rejected recommendations to eliminate discrimination on the basis of sexuality; the country also refused to amend laws that may discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
The CEDAW Committee provided no SOGIESC-focused observations in the 51st Session. The List of Issues also did not ask any pertinent questions related to LBTI people.
The Committee put forth a few general observations and recommendations that can be applicable to LBTI people:
(a) to establish an accessible complaints mechanism so that women can report discrimination and violations of their rights;
(b) to adopt a comprehensive strategy to eliminate negative stereotypes and adverse traditional beliefs and practices that cause discrimination;
(c) to collect and compile data on violence against women, disaggregated by sex, age and relationship between the victim and perpetrator, and carry out an in-depth analysis for policy design;
(d) to provide care, support as well as programmes for women and girls to be “reintegrated into society” if they wish to leave “prostitution”;
(e) to improve SRHR services by ensuring free and adequate access to contraceptives, decriminalising abortions, providing HIV/AIDS-related care.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are subject to violence, stigma, and discrimination in both public and private spheres, within the State party. Section 56 (Sodomy and Bestiality) of the Offences Against the Person Act 1986, criminalises buggery between men with a penalty of up to ten years imprisonment, with or without hard labour.
The State party does not legally recognise same-sex unions or marriages. The rights of transgender and intersex people are not legally recognised or protected in St. Kitts and Nevis.
In 2011, in its first UPR cycle, St. Kitts and Nevis accepted that the criminalisation of sexual relations between consenting adults was controversial.
St. Kitts and Nevis rejected recommendations to decriminalise sexual relations between consenting adults of the same sex but confirmed that it would continue to engage on the issue through a consultative process.
In its second UPR cycle, St. Kitts and Nevis noted the recommendations to decriminalise consensual same-sex sexual relations.
In 2015, St. Kitts and Nevis voted against a failed Russian proposal at the UN General Assembly’s Fifth Committee (Administrative and Budgetary) to overturn the UN Secretary-General’s decision to extend UN staff benefits to married same-sex couples.
In 2011, during the 10th Session of the Human Rights Council, the government of St. Kitts and Nevis stated that it had no mandate from the people to decriminalise homosexuality amongst consenting adults.
In the 27th Session, the CEDAW Committee did not provide any LBTI-focused recommendations to St. Kitts and Nevis.
The 2020 list of issues did not contain any LBTI-specific issues but there were a few issues that would be useful for LBTI communities. They were requested to
i) provide information on measures taken to specifically criminalize all forms of gender-based violence against women and girls and to include a consent-based definition of rape, including marital rape, in the Criminal Code;
ii) to indicate any steps taken to introduce the ex officio prosecution of offenders in domestic violence cases and to ensure their prosecution even upon withdrawal of a complaint, or in the absence of testimony, by the victim in court;
iii) to describe the steps taken by the State party to ensure that cases of gender-based violence against women and girls are under no circumstances settled through mediation;
iv) to indicate measures taken to prosecute perpetrators of sexual abuse against girls and to enforce strict penalties for the acceptance of bribes for discontinuing criminal investigations or prosecution in such cases.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people face significant challenges legally and socially in Trinidad and Tobago. In April 2018, the High Court of Justice ruled that the laws — sections 13 (buggery) and 16 (serious indecency) of the Sexual Offenses Act — criminalising same-sex intimacy between consenting adults are unconstitutional. There are no specific laws explicitly protecting LBTI people from discrimination, violence, stigma, and hate crimes.
Same-sex unions or marriages are not legalised in Trinidad and Tobago. The Trinidadian legislation contains no explicit recognition and protection of the rights of transgender and intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee provided no SOGIESC-focused observations to Trinidad and Tobago at the 64th Session. There were no LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that may apply to LBTI people included:
(a) to provide age-appropriate education and access to comprehensive SRHR;
(b) to legalise abortion in cases of rape, incest, and severe foetal impairment and to decriminalise abortion in all other cases;
(c) to continue to scale up the provision of free antiretroviral treatment to all women;
(d) to intensify efforts to address the root causes of trafficking in women and girls and to ensure the rehabilitation and social integration of victims, including by providing them with legal, medical and psychosocial assistance, and to bolster awareness-raising programmes.

Members of the lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) communities in Jamaica are denied access to basic rights and services, resulting in an alarming rate of human rights violations against them.
The criminalisation of homosexuality in Jamaica dates back to the 1864 Offences Against the Person Act, which calls for a punishment of up to 10 years of imprisonment with hard labor for those convicted of the “abominable crime of buggery” (Section 76) or “act of gross indecency” (Section 79).
There is no legal recognition for same-sex unions and marriages. In Jamaica, transgender people do not have legal recognition, and intersex people are subject to many challenges as they are not protected by law.
The CEDAW Committee provided no SOGIESC-focused observations to Jamaica at the 52nd Session. The List of Issues had no LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) to strengthen measures to prevent and address trafficking and protect victims of trafficking with support services, including alternative employment;
(b) to strengthen monitoring and data collection on women’s access to healthcare, and improve SRHR, adequate access to contraceptives and women living with HIV/AIDS;
(c) to remove punitive provisions imposed on women who undergo abortion.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Brunei are marginalised, and receive a lot of backlashes legally as well as socially, economically, and politically. The Brunei Penal Code discriminates against and poses grave threats to LBTI people. Consensual same-sex acts can be punishable by stoning to death, in keeping with Sharia Law.
Like other former British colonies, Brunei Penal Code has Section 377 that criminalises “carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal” with up to ten years in prison and a fine. Any form of sexual conduct between women (“lesbianism”, referred to as “musahaqah”) is punishable with up to 40 strokes with whips and prison terms up to 10 years.
The penal code also criminalises nonconforming gender expression, punishing “any man who dresses and poses as a woman or any woman who dresses and poses as a man in any public place” with prison time and a fine.
During Brunei’s Universal Periodic Review at the UN Human Rights Council on May 10, 2019, the Foreign Minister of Brunei asserted that the prohibition on consensual same-sex conduct “is to ensure such acts are refrained and are limited to the private space.”
The CEDAW Committee’s Concluding Observations to Brunei in 2014 contains one SOGIESC-focused recommendation. The Committee noted that Brunei does not currently have legislation to protect women from discrimination or specific legislation criminalising gender violence.
These realities and the complete lack of legal protections compound the implications that Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013 has for the physical integrity and autonomy of all women, including LBTI people.Thus, the Committee urged Brunei to review provisions of the Code as women “are disproportionately affected by punishment for ‘crimes’ involving sex” and it “will face greater difficulty in collecting the evidence necessary to prove rape, meaning that the fear of being accused of particular adultery and extramarital relations is likely to prevent women from reporting rape.”
The List of Issues did not contain any LBTI-inclusive questions. The Committee noted that Brunei does not have a clear definition for discrimination against women, and there is no plan to incorporate this in the Constitution.

The rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are suppressed in Bangladesh. Bangladesh’s British-era laws criminalised consensual same-sex relationships under Section 377 of the Penal Code, where the maximum penalty is life imprisonment. This is exacerbated by Sharia law, where the sexual activity of any nature outside a heterosexual marriage is prohibited.
Same-sex marriage and unions are also not legally recognised. Bangladesh authorities often use the Penal Code to harass and persecute LBTI people including by refusing them permission to register thematic organisations.
In 2014, the Bangladesh government approved ‘hijra sex’ as the third gender. However, this decision does not include transgender men or transgender women who don't identify as hijra. Intersex people do not have any legal mechanism to access their rights.
The CEDAW Committee provided no SOGIESC-focused observations at the 65th Session to Bangladesh. The List of Issues also did not ask any pertinent questions related to LBTI people.
The Committee provided other recommendations that may be applied to LBTI people which included an observation where women and girls from vulnerable groups have access to basic services, including education, employment, and health care, without discrimination, and have a right to be free from domestic violence and trafficking.

Cyprus protects the rights of its lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people only to a certain extent. Consensual same-sex sexual relationships between adults, previously criminalised under Section 171 of the 1959 Criminal Code, became legal in 1998 following the Modinas v Cyprus case. Northern Cyprus, which is disputed and de facto controlled by Turkey decriminalised consensual same-sex relationships between adults in 2014.
The Cypriot Criminal Code (Amendment) Act 2017 provides for the aggravation of penalties when offences are committed because of the victim’s sexual orientation. Article 6(1) of the Combating Racism and Other Forms of Discrimination (Commissioner) Act 2004 proscribes direct and indirect discrimination in public and private spheres based on sexual orientation in matters such as employment, education, health, and goods and services.
Same-sex marriages are not legally recognised though same-sex civil unions are legal since 2015. Cyprus lacks gender recognition procedures and does not provide any explicit legal recognition and protection for intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee’s Concluding Observations to Cyprus in 2013 did not contain any SOGIESC-focused recommendations.
In 2018, The CEDAW Committee acknowledged and welcomed Cyprus’ efforts to legitimise same-sex relationships by the adoption of the Civil Union Law in 2015, which recognises “the right of LBT women to enter into same-sex civil unions and cohabitation”. The Concluding Observation made no mention of intersex people.
The civil society submission for the pre-sessional working group (PSWG) mentioned transphobic and homophobic outlooks of school authorities towards school children and youth.
However, the List of Issues produced by the Committee as a result of the PSWG remained silent on this; and instead followed up on data collated by the State Party, and raised issues around “the economic consequences of a dissolution of cohabitation, as the law providing for same-sex civil unions was adopted on 2015. By January 2017, 88 civil unions had been solemnised under this law'.
The Committee’s language is not SOGIESC-specific but also makes a recommendation to “ensure adequate protection for children born to or adopted in the context of de facto unions and other civil unions” under the section ‘Marriage and family union’ within the Concluding Observations.
Apart from these LBTI rights-affirming recommendations, the Committee made some neutral observations applicable to all women that will apply to LBTI people as well.
These include (a) ensuring the availability and accessibility of affordable modern forms of reproductive health services for all women and girls; (b) full application of the law decriminalising abortion using protocols and regulations; (c) effective enforcement of anti-trafficking legislation to identify women who are victims of trafficking and sex work and provide them with legal support, access to shelters, rehabilitation, and exit programmes and alternative income-generation activities, if they choose to leave sex-work.
Lastly, the Committee provided recommendations to ensure protection and assistance to women who are victims of gender-based violence, in the form of human, technical, and financial resources, as well as psychosocial rehabilitation and reintegration programmes.

The environment for lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people has been evolving for many years now; they face significant legal and societal challenges. In September 2018, through a landmark decision in Navtej Johar v. Union of India, the Supreme Court decriminalised same-sex conduct by striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.
Same-sex marriages and civil unions are not legally recognised in India. In the NALSA v. Union of India in April 2014, the Supreme Court recognised that the rights and freedoms of transgender people are protected by the Constitution.
Although the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019 includes the definition of gender non-confirming identities, it wrongly defines intersex people within the definition of “transgender”, and does not recognise the right to self-identify.
To date, the explicit protection against treatment and surgery on intersex children without their consent has only been introduced in the state of Tamil Nadu.
The CEDAW Committee provided India with a SOGIESC-specific recommendation at the 58th Session. The List of Issues did not ask any pertinent questions related to LBTI people.
The Committee indicated its concern about the criminalisation of consensual same-sex relationships between adults according to the ruling of the Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation case. This case was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Navtej Johar case in 2018.
The Committee urged the State party to make efforts to eliminate any criminalisation of consensual same-sex relationships between adults.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) to adopt comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation that prohibits discrimination on all grounds referred to in General Recommendation No. 28;
(b) to protect women from multiple or intersectional forms of discrimination;
(c) to implement the recommendations of the Justice Verma Committee regarding violence against women, including women from the marginalised communities;
(b) to ensure more equal and inclusive access to sexual and reproduction health and rights.

In Botswana, lesbian, transgender, bisexual, and intersex (LBTI) people continue facing discrimination and stigma despite several legal developments over the last decade.
In June 2019, however, the High Court of Botswana read down Section 164 of Botswana's Penal Code and decriminalised consensual same-sex relations in a landmark judgment. The Court stated in a unanimous decision that legislation was discriminatory, unconstitutional, and against the public interest. In 2017, two transgender individuals successfully challenged in Court the Birth and Death Act that prohibits changing sex in ID unless wrongly put. However, no policy or law change followed as a result of the legal challenge.
There are no policies or laws that would explicitly recognise or protect the rights of intersex people. Botswana is also one of 6 African states that voted in favour of the 2017 UN resolution condemning countries that use the death penalty as a punishment for consensual same-sex relations.
In March 2019, a few months before this judgment, Botswana received its very first SOGIESC-focused recommendation from the CEDAW Committee. The Committee was concerned about the lack of equal access to free antiretroviral treatment for LBTI people, amongst other disadvantaged groups, and it was recommended that access to such treatment and other public services may be made easier.
The List of Issues contained a question on what measures were put within the Employment Amendment Act of 2010 to ensure that LBTI people’s access to employment can be promoted. This question, however, does not find an answer within the Committee’s observations.
Other non-SOGIESC recommendations that can be read to include LBT women were on access to services around gender-based violence, including shelters, better enforcement of the law; and anti-trafficking measures, including the provision of counselling and legal services, accessible services, and alternate job opportunities for victims of trafficking.

New Zealand secures the rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people and protects them from discrimination, stigma, and violence. Consensual same-sex conduct between adults was decriminalised in New Zealand in 1986 through the enactment of the Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986. The Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Act 2013 legalised same-sex marriage as well as providing the right of adoption by same-sex couples.
There is legal recognition of transgender people’s rights including their right to self-identity, the ability to change their gender and record this change in government documents, and to receive medical care, including gender affirmation surgery. With regard to intersex people, New Zealand’s perspective has been progressive, but a lot still needs to be done.
In October 2016, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child issued observations on practices in New Zealand, including recommendations to ensure “that no one is subjected to unnecessary medical or surgical treatment during infancy or childhood, guaranteeing the rights of children to bodily integrity, autonomy, and self-determination”.
A 2016 Intersex Roundtable by the Human Rights Commission on genital “normalising' surgeries found that there was a lack of political will to address surgeries, concerns with service delivery to parents and families, the development of legislative safeguards, and a need to test the right to bodily autonomy against the Bill of Rights Act.
At the 70th Session, the CEDAW Committee gave New Zealand their second SOGIESC-focused recommendation. In 2012, the Committee had recommended New Zealand “improve access and quality of health services for lesbian women and transgendered persons.” However, no SOGIESC issues had been included in the Committee’s List of Issues for New Zealand.
In 2018, the Committee recommended that the State party adopt clear legislative provisions explicitly prohibiting unnecessary surgical or medical treatment for intersex children before they can legally consent to such treatment.
The Committee recommended that the State party set up a centralised system for the collection, analysis and dissemination of comprehensive data, disaggregated by sex, age, disability, ethnicity, location, gender identity and sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status to assess trends in the situation of women.
The Committee was concerned about the high incidence of cyberbullying in high schools and how this affects young LBTI people. There was an acknowledgment of the State party’s comprehensive health coverage and urged the State to improve access and quality of medical care for LBT people, and also promote education on SRHR and pregnancy for young girls and women.
There was concern from the Committee that discrimination on the grounds of gender identity, gender expression, or sex characteristics is not specifically prohibited.

Lesbian, bisexual, trans, and intersex (LBTI) people face several legal challenges in Seychelles despite legal developments in the last decade. In 2016, the Parliament voted to amend Section 151 of the Penal Code to decriminalise same-sex conduct. However, there is no legal recognition of same-sex relationships.
Protection from employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation has been made possible through the 2006 amendment to the Employment Act 1995. Seychelles is one of the few African countries to provide this right to LBTI people. In the case of Mervin Jezabel Barbe, there was a blatant lack of recognition and protection of trans rights when the plaintiff decided to change their gender in official records; this case is currently at the UN Human Rights Committee. Seychelles also does not have a framework to protect intersex rights.
Seychelles received its first SOGIESC-focused recommendation at the 74th Session in 2019. The Committee urged the state to makes changes in its legislative policy to eliminate gender-based violence and discrimination against LBT women, including investigation, prosecution, and punishment of perpetrators and through awareness-raising methods to remove the stigma against LBTI identities.
The Committee also noted that while same-sex relationships have been decriminalised, it remains concerned about the acts of violence and systemic discrimination against LBT women. It welcomed the repeal of legal provisions that banned ‘sexual intercourse against the order of nature’ in 2016. The recommendation did not include intersex people in its ambit.
The List of Issues included a question on the State party’s next steps and strategy on the repealing of provisions that criminalised same-sex relationships, in the light of its commitments to do so under the universal periodic review.

For a long time, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LBTI) people were subjected to discrimination, violence and stigma. LBTI rights in the UK have evolved over time. Same-sex sexual activity was characterised as “sinful” and, under the Buggery Act 1533, was outlawed and punishable by death, but through the passing of the Sexual Offences Act, 1967, consensual same-sex relationships between adult men were finally decriminalised.
Same-sex civil partnerships were legalised under the Civil Partnership Act, 2004. And later, same-sex marriage became legal under the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act in 2013.
The Equality Act 2010 forms the basis for all anti-discrimination for LBT people in the UK. Transgender people have the legal recognition of their right to self-identity through the Gender Recognition Act 2004, and following an announcement in February 2021, the UK Census on 21 March 2021 included gender for the first time for data collection and statistical analysis.
There is still some resistance by the State Party to engage on the rights of intersex people, as evidenced by the fact that they are not fully protected from discrimination or from non-consensual medical procedures.
The United Kingdom received its first SOGIESC-focused recommendation from the CEDAW Committee during the 72nd Session in 2019. The Committee recommended that the State Party reviews the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act in order to address intersectional discrimination, including against LBTI women with socioeconomic inequalities.
The Committee also asked the State Party to systematically collect and publish data disaggregated by sex, gender, ethnicity, disability, and age throughout the whole of its territory to inform policy-making and assess the impact of measures taken.
The List of Issues had three SOGIESC-inclusive questions, on medical surgeries on intersex children, violence, and abuse against LBT women and girls, and gender-based harassment and bullying, particularly against trans women and girls.
Other general recommendations that can apply to all LBTI people include:
(a) ensuring that women in vulnerable situations (including sex workers) have effective access to employment opportunities, housing, and social security, and providing “women in prostitution” inclusive mechanisms to exit “prostitution”;
(b) strengthened and provide access to healthcare for all women; and
(c) provide access to justice, medical care and psychosocial support for victims of gender-based violence.

The lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people enjoy a number of rights in Malta. Same-sex relationships were decriminalised in 1973 through an executive order, and civil unions for same-sex couples have been legal since 2014 through the Civil Unions Act 2014, while marriage was legalised in 2017 — Marriage Act and other Laws (Amendment) Act, 2017.
Legal protection for LBTI persons in Malta exists in the area of employment, through the transposition of the European Union Employment Framework Directive. In 2014, the Parliament of Malta unanimously approved a bill that amended the Constitution to add protections from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
In April 2015, Malta became the first country in the world to outlaw sterilisation and invasive surgery on intersex people. The Gender Identity, Gender Expression And Sex Characteristics Act (2015) protects both trans and intersex people.
It has been a long time since Malta has had its last CEDAW session. During the 47th Session in 2010 - which was Malta’s last, the Committee noted and appreciated that the “National Commission for the Promotion of Equality is competent to cover discrimination on the basis of sexual identity, amongst other forms of discrimination.”
Other general recommendations by Committee that can apply to LBTI people within Malta are:
(a) Review and establish a women-centric definition of rape and violent assault with consent at its centre;
(b) Improve access to SRHR services, review its legislation on abortion and remove punitive measures for women who undergo abortion;
(c) Provide comprehensive information on the prevalence of trafficking, as well as create mechanisms for women who are victims of trafficking to access psychosocial aftercare.

Kenya does not provide full legal recognition and protection of the rights of its lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) communities. Sections 162 and 165 of the Kenyan Penal Code criminalise adult consensual same-sex relationships. The sections were legally challenged on the basis of their unconstitutionality in 2016. In 2019, Kenya’s High Court upheld the law as not discriminatory and stated it would, if abolished, open the door to same-sex marriage which is unconstitutional in Kenya.
Kenya does not explicitly recognise or protect the rights of transgender and intersex people. However, in 2019, Kenya became the first country in Africa to incorporate an intersex category into the national census.
The CEDAW Committee provided a SOGIESC-focused recommendation to Kenya at the 68th Session.
The Committee recommended that Kenya exercise due diligence to protect all women, including lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women and intersex persons, against discrimination by adopting comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation affording such protection; this was in line with the recommendation accepted by Kenya during the universal periodic review process in 2015 on the adoption of a comprehensive anti-discrimination law affording protection to all individuals.
The Committee noted with concern that there was a lack of comprehensive anti‑discrimination legislation in the State party, including the absence of clear and complete protection against intersectional discrimination in the Constitution, and the fact that same-sex consensual relationships between adults remain criminalised.

Malawi's government submitted their eighth periodic report under article 18 of the CEDAW convention in February 2021; this report was due in 2019. Despite two rights-affirming recommendations by the CEDAW Committee in 2015 that had SOGIESC elements, Malawi government did not refer to the LBTI constituencies in their state reports. In fact, they only referred to the issue of decriminalising same sex relationships between women.
Malawi commissioned the Malawi Human Rights Commission (MHRC) in 2018 to undertake public consultation with a view to soliciting views from Malawians on whether or not to remove from the Penal Code sections that criminalise same sex relationships. This consultation process, according to the state party report, is still ongoing. The periodic report also had other information around violence prevention, marital rape, SRHR, and anti-trafficking but these don't refer to the LBTI communities. They are also not included within the anti-discrimination procedures and processes.
Malawi’s punitive legal environment combined with social stigma and intense violence prevents many lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people from living full lives.
The Malawi Constitution does not specifically prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity.
Consensual same-sex conduct and acts are criminalised under Sections 153 and 154 of the Penal Code. Section 153 bans “unnatural offenses” with imprisonment for seven years, with or without corporal punishment. Section 137 (a) criminalises “indecent practices between females” in public or private with imprisonment for five years.
There is no legal recognition of transgender identity in Malawi. In fact, section 180 (g) of the Penal Code criminalises gender expression - “criminalises men who wear their hair beyond a certain length, with a penalty of three months imprisonment, and for repeat offenders, six months imprisonment and a fine.” Malawi does not have a framework for the protection of intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee made two rights-affirming recommendations for Malawi that included some SOGIESC elements. The Committee indicated its concern that the Penal Code Amendment of 2011 criminalises same-sex relationships between women, and recommended decriminalising sexual relationships between adult women.
The List of Issues had a LBTI-inclusive question that asked whether any steps are envisaged to decriminalise same-sex relations between consenting adults and to recognise the rights of lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women and intersex persons to equality and non-discrimination, as well as to review section 20 of the Constitution to include sexual orientation among the grounds on which discrimination is prohibited.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) to reduce maternal mortality by ensuring adequate SRHR services;
(b) to reinforce measures to protect women and girls with albinism from all forms of violence and address the discrimination, stigmatization and social exclusion faced by them;
(c) concern at the various forms of discrimination and criminal sanctions faced by 'women in prostitution' and at the insufficient programmes for women wishing to 'leave prostitution'.

In Nigeria, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people face harassment, violence, torture, cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment at the hands of both private and state actors. Consensual same-sex acts are criminalised under the Criminal Code that is actively enforced by the authorities. Section 214 criminalises “carnal knowledge” against the order of nature with a penalty of fourteen years imprisonment. It applies to sexual intercourse between men.
The Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act criminalises all forms of same-sex unions and same-sex marriage throughout the country — “A person who enters into a same-sex marriage contract or civil union liable for 14 years' imprisonment”. The law forbids any cohabitation between same-sex sexual partners and bans any “public show of same-sex amorous relationship.”
There is no legal recognition for transgender and intersex people in Nigeria. Furthermore, the Penal Code of Northern Nigeria criminalises gender non-conforming identity and expression.
The CEDAW Committee provided a SOGIESC-specific recommendation to Nigeria at the 77th Session. The Committee stated that it has grave concern at the reports of intersecting discrimination and violence against women and girls caused by homophobia, and recommended that Nigeria take measures to address this prejudice and to protect affected women and girls. The List of Issues did not have any LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) to investigate, prosecute and punish perpetrators of alleged sexual exploitation, including so-called “transactional sex”, in camps for internally displaced persons in Maiduguri and other places;
(b) to protect women and girls who are disproportionately affected by conflicts, from gender-based violence;
(c) to strengthen the collection of statistical data on all forms of violence against women, including domestic violence, disaggregated by age, type of offence and relationship between the victim and the perpetrator;
(d) to support victims of trafficking by providing them with access to shelters, legal, medical and psychosocial assistance, and adequate income-generating opportunities.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people are subjected to many human rights violations and face major stigmatisation in Cameroon. The Cameroon Constitution also does not have any SOGIESC provisions to protect LBTI people from discrimination.
Consensual same-sexual relations between adults are criminalised in Cameroon and punished with imprisonment through Article 347-1 of the Penal Code and the Law on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime 2010. The Code is actively enforced by the authorities.
Same-sex unions or marriages are not recognised by law. The rights of interesex and transgender people neither legally recognised no explicitly protected.
The CEDAW Committee provided a SOGIESC-specific recommendation to Cameroon at the 57th Session. The Committee indicated concern about the lack of adequate protection and assistance for disadvantaged groups of women such as lesbian, bisexual and transgender women who are victims of discrimination and criminalisation. The Committee did not mention intersex people in the recommendation. The List of Issues does not have any LBTI-inclusive questions.
Other general recommendations by the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) to ensure the implementation of the national strategy to prevent and combat violence against women;
(b) investigate and ensure the protection of victims of trafficking;
(c) to ensure access to SRHR services for all women and consider broadening the conditions under which abortion can be legally available;
(d) to intensify measures to reduce the high rate of HIV/AIDS amongst women and girls and provide a legal framework to protect the rights of women who are living with HIV/AIDS;
(e) to develop a gender indicator system to improve the collection of data disaggregated by sex and other relevant factors necessary to assess the impact and effectiveness of policies and programmes aimed at mainstreaming gender equality and enhancing women’s enjoyment of their human rights.

Uganda is not a safe and secure place for lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people, as their legal rights are not protected, and they are subject to a lot of violence, stigma, and discrimination. Section 145 of the Ugandan Penal Code criminalises consensual same-sex conduct.
In December 2013, the Uganda Anti-Homosexuality Act was passed to expand the definition and include women as well as increase punishment for “aggravated homosexuality”. However, this law was annulled in August 2014. In May 2021, Uganda reintroduced the criminalisation of same-sex relationships as well as sex work through the passing of the Sexual Offences Bill 2019.
Same-sex marriage and unions are banned under the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Act — “a person who enters into a same-sex marriage contract or civil union liable for 14 years' imprisonment”. In 2005, President Museveni signed a constitutional amendment prohibiting same-sex marriage. Clause 2a of Section 31 states: 'marriage between persons of the same sex is prohibited”.
There is no legislation or constitutional provision that protects LBTI people from discrimination and hate crimes. Transgender people do not have the right to self-identify in Uganda. In fact, Section 381 (1) of the Penal (Amended) Code “any person who, with intent to defraud any person, falsely represents himself or herself to be some other person, living or dead, commits a misdemeanour”.
Intersex people in Uganda face many challenges with little to no protection from mutilation and non-consensual cosmetic medical procedures.
Uganda is one of the first countries to have ever received a SOGIESC-specific recommendation from the CEDAW Committee. At the 47th Session, the Committee indicated concern that homosexuality is criminalised in Uganda, that they face discrimination in employment, health care, education, and other fields, and many LBTI people are subject to violence and hate crimes; and lastly, concern on the (then) Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which would marginalise LBTI people further.
The Committee recommended that homosexuality should be decriminalised, and protection provided from violence and intensify efforts to combat discrimination against women on account of their sexual orientation and gender identity, including by launching a sensitization campaign aimed at the general public, as well as providing appropriate training to law enforcement officials and other relevant actors.
While there were no questions in 2010, the List of Issues from 2021 for Uganda has LBTI-inclusive questions that use an intersectional lens. The questions asked were about what measures the State party has used to implement the Committee’s previous recommendations to effectively protect LBTI people from violence and discrimination, and what steps have been taken to revise laws that criminalise same-sex relations and marriages.
At the 81st Session, the Committee had similar concerns with the state party, as it did in 2010. Some of the recommendations centred around the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where they suggested that the State party should look towards redressing long-standing inequalities, through recovery strategies, that have impacted and aggravated discrimination against lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons. The Committee also noted with concern that women human rights defenders advocating for the rights of lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons are at particular risk due to the rippling effects of the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2014, although it was struck down by the Constitutional Court.
Lastly, the Committee recommended the continued use and implementation of the National Policy Guidelines on Ending HIV Stigma 2021 and other strategies, policies and programmes on HIV/AIDS to address the high prevalence of HIV/AIDS amongst LBTI people, along with other marginalised communities. All recommendations, therefore, were rights-affirming.
The 2022 list of issues stated that Uganda has reported that there are no data indicating that women have been discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity (para. 162), and yet, according to information before the Committee, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, including refugees, continue to face extreme stigma, discrimination and violence and are subject to arbitrary detention and harassment by law enforcement officials. There was a request to explain the measures taken to implement the Committee's previous recommendations from 2010 that included a provision of effective protection from violence and discrimination against women based on their sexual orientation and gender identity and prohibit and combat all forms of discrimination against women on account of their sexual orientation and gender identity, including through public awareness-raising and the provision of training to relevant actors, including law enforcement officials. Additionally, there was also a request to understand what steps had been taken to revise the illegality of same-sex relations and marriages under the Penal Code.

It should be noted that this recommendation from the Committee is over a decade old, and that there was significant engagement on the Committee’s part to read LBTI rights under the Convention at that time.
Despite Mozambique’s progressively changing views on sexual orientation and gender identity, its lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) communities do not feel completely protected from discrimination, violence, and stigma. In March 2011, the Minister of Justice declared during the UN Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review that homosexuality is not an offence in Mozambique.
The status of same-sex relationships in Mozambique was ambiguous until 2015 when the enactment of the new Criminal Code did not include any penalising provisions regarding same-sex activity. Same-sex unions and marriage are not legally recognised.
While some legal provisions in Mozambique protect LBTI people from discrimination, there is no law that allows for gender affirmation or provisions that recognise intersex rights.
Article 4 of the 23/2007 Labour Law provides for “non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, race or HIV/AIDS status”. Article 5 of the law grants employees a right to privacy, relating to “the private and personal lives of employees, such as their family lives, personal relationships, sex lives, state of health and their political and religious convictions.” Article 108 of the law provides that “all employees, whether nationals or foreigners, without distinction based on sex, sexual orientation, [...] have the right to receive a wage and to enjoy equal benefits for equal work”.
At the 73rd Session, the CEDAW Committee indicated concern about the reports of detention of women with young children and of sexual harassment and abuse against women in detention, including lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, and intersex people.
The Committee also recommended that Mozambique improves the conditions in female detention facilities in accordance with the United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non‑custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules) and intensify efforts to prevent gender-based violence against women in detention, including lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, and intersex persons.
While the Committee provided SOGIESC-specific recommendations, the List of Issues did not have any LBTI-specific questions.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people continue to be subjected to intense violence, stigma, and discrimination in The Gambia. Consensual same-sex conduct is illegal between both men and women by way of Section 144 of the Criminal (Amendment) Code, 2005. Section 144(a) makes provision for the offence of “aggravated homosexuality”, which enumerates various aggravating circumstances, including where the offender is “living with HIV Aids” or is a “serial offender”, punishable with life imprisonment.
Section 167 of the Criminal Code criminalises “any man who dresses in the fashion of a woman in a public place with a penalty of up to five years imprisonment and a possible fine”. The Gambia does not have a framework to protect transgender or intersex rights.
At the 61st Session, the Committee had a SOGIESC-specific recommendation to The Gambia. The Committee noted that homosexual acts are criminalised in the State party and that “aggravated homosexuality” carries sentences of up to life imprisonment.
The Committee also noted with concern that LBT women in The Gambia are subject to hate crimes and arbitrary detention when perceived to be lesbians. Thus, the Committee urged The Gambia to repeal the provisions of the Criminal Code on “unnatural offences” and “aggravated homosexuality”, end the arbitrary detention of lesbians and provide them with effective protection from violence and discrimination and provide appropriate training to law enforcement officials.
There were no LBTI-inclusive questions in the List of Issues.
In the sixth periodic report that was submitted by the Gambia in December 2020, the State party responded to the CEDAW Committee's recommendations by stating that the issue of LGBT was not considered to be a problem in The Gambia because even though it is criminalised the LGBT community are not subjected to any form of discrimination and harassment. The state party also stated that the people of The Gambia have not accepted homosexuality as a lifestyle and so the government as the representative of the people does not plan to decriminalise the practice of homosexuality. Unfortunately, this means that LBTI people will continue to be criminalised, stigmatised and discriminated against.
The list of issues in March 2022 did not have any LBTI-specific issues.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) constituencies within Fiji are somewhat protected from discrimination, stigma, and unsafe conditions. In 1997, Fiji amended its Constitution to explicitly protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation; this Constitution was abolished in 2009; the new Constitutional document promulgated in September 2013 banned discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity and expression through Article 26, therefore, centering SOGIESC values.
Since 1 February 2010, private, adult, consensual, and non-commercial male and female homosexual conduct has been legal under the Crimes Decree 2010. However, same-sex unions, including marriage, remain unrecognised legally.
Transgender and intersex people are also not legally recognised and are victims of gender-based violence and hate crimes.
In 2011, Fiji supported the UN Human Rights Council Joint Statement to end acts of violence based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.
The CEDAW Committee in the 69th Session acknowledged a bill by Fiji that may decriminalise same-sex relationships, though, in 2019, the Prime Minister of Fiji has made it known that he will not accept same-sex couples having the same rights as heterosexual couples, and therefore, same-sex marriage will not be a reality in the State party.
The Committee showed its concern that LBT people are subjected to bullying, including cyberbullying, and asked the State to adopt an anti-bullying policy, and introduce awareness-raising in schools to prevent discrimination and violence.
There was also concern about the ongoing hostility towards LBT women that manifests in hate crimes, violence, and discrimination in both public and private spaces, which makes it difficult for the constituencies to record changes in gender on their birth certificates.
The Committee recommended that the State party makes legislative changes and implement a policy to eliminate discrimination, hate speech, and violence against LBT women, including by prosecuting and adequately punishing perpetrators, and conduct awareness-raising activities to address stigma within society, and allow changes in gender on birth certificates. The Committee did not mention intersex people.
The List of Issues contained a question about safeguards in place to protect LBTI women and girls from discrimination in the light of a discriminatory incident towards a student at a boarding school, and whether there are other such cases that have come to light. The Committee addressed this question but only in the context of LBT women intersex people were not mentioned in the Concluding Observations.

The Bahamas protects the rights of its lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people only to a certain extent. Consensual same-sex conduct between adults was decriminalised in 1991, however, the Constitution does not include protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Additionally, protection against discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation is not addressed in the Employment Act of 2001.
There is no legal framework for the protection of rights for transgender and intersex people.
In the previous Concluding Observations in July 2012, the CEDAW Committee expressed grave concerns that the State party “does not see itself as bound by CEDAW Article 9 on the basis that Bahamian citizens rejected, in a constitutional referendum, the withdrawal of the constitutional provision preventing women from passing their nationality to their children or to their spouses of foreign nationality on an equal basis with men.”
Despite the Bahamas’ failure to implement the Committee’s last recommendation to remove discriminatory constitutional provisions preventing women from fully actualising their rights, the CEDAW Committee’s observations in 2018 were SOGIESC-specific. In fact, the Bahamas received its first two SOGIESC recommendations in November 2018.
The Committee showed concern regarding the “the failure to eliminate intersecting forms of discrimination in particular against women of Haitian descent, migrant women, women with disabilities, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, intersex persons and women living in the Family Islands.” With regard to this, the Committee recommended adopting a comprehensive action plan against discrimination impacting women, including LBT women and intersex people.
The second recommendation was regarding a high reported incidence of gender-based violence against LBTI people and urged the State party to review the cultural norms that normalise such violence.
Additionally, the State party was asked to adopt an action plan that includes adequate resources, a timeline and measurable targets requiring authorities to implement relevant laws to prevent and eliminate all forms of de facto discrimination against LBTI people.
The Bahamas did not receive questions regarding the protection of LBTI people in its List of Issues; however, civil society submissions had a strengthened SOGIESC focus.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Antigua and Barbuda are subject to violence, discrimination, and stigma, whether it be punitive state action or lack of protection. Sections 12 and 15 of the Sexual Offences Act, 1995 criminalise same-sex conduct and relationships.
There is no protection against discrimination for LBTI people on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, and same-sex marriages do not have legal recognition. Transgender and intersex rights are not protected by Antigua and Barbuda’s laws.
The State Party received its first SOGIESC-focused recommendations. The Committee recommended that the State Party should increase awareness amongst LBT and other women of their rights and how to use redress mechanisms using the CEDAW Convention as well as the Optional Protocol and General Recommendations.
The Committee also suggested that the State party should also ensure access of LBT women to healthcare, employment, and social services, amongst other things, while removing all discriminatory barriers.
Lastly, the Committee maintained that comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation that prohibits all forms of discrmination, provides equal access to opportunities and services, and decriminalises same-sex relations is key to provide a safe environment for LBT women. Intersex people were not a part of these recommendations.
Other non-SOGIESC recommendations that can be read to include LBT women are:
(a) to legalise abortion in cases where the life or health of the pregnant woman is in danger, dicriminalise it in all other cases, and ensure access and affordability for women to abortion-related care;
(b) to ensure access to HIV/AIDS-related healthcare services including antiretroviral medicines, for women and girls living with HIV/AIDS, paying particular attention to sex-workers, and
(c) to update the national strategic plan for health to address stigma and discrimination.
The List of Issues contained questions about any steps that the State party has taken to eliminate discrimination against and stigmatisation of certain minority or disadvantaged groups, including migrant women, women who are internally displaced, women living with HIV/AIDS and lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex people.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people face significant legal and social challenges in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The Penal Code makes consensual same-sex conduct illegal — Section 146 prohibits “buggery”, with a penalty of ten years imprisonment. The law applies to both men and women.
The State party also does not address discrimination and harassment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity and does not legally recognise same-sex unions, marriages, and partnerships. The rights of transgender and intersex people are neither legally recognised nor protected in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
In 2016, in its second UPR cycle, St. Vincent and the Grenadines noted the recommendations concerning decriminalisation of consensual same-sex activities between adults and the need to protect and prohibit discrimination against LGBT persons.
In 2011, in its first UPR cycle, St. Vincent and the Grenadines rejected recommendations to decriminalise consensual same-sex sexual relations: “The Government of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines cannot accept at this time this recommendation to repeal provisions against lesbian and gays, as the public sentiment favours the retention of provisions which criminalize buggery and sexual relations between adults of the same sex…”.
The CEDAW Committee provided an LBT-inclusive recommendation at the 61st Session. The Committee indicated concern that women in same-sex relationships are excluded from the categories of persons who can apply for protection under the Domestic Violence Act, and recommended that no woman is excluded from seeking and obtaining protection from the law on the basis of the type of relationship in which she is engaged.
The List of Issues did not have any SOGIESC-focused questions. There was no mention of intersex people in the Concluding Observations or in the List of Issues.
Other general observations from the Committee that can apply to LBTI people include:
(a) enhancing support services for victims of trafficking and sexual exploitation;
(b) access to affordable sexual and reproductive health and rights and contraceptives;
(c) removal of barriers and structural stereotypes from fields of study or employment that are considered traditionally male.

Guyana’s laws continue to subject its lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) citizens to discrimination. Consensual same-sex conduct is illegal; Section 353 criminalises attempts to commit “buggery”, with a penalty of ten years imprisonment. There is no legal recognition for same-sex unions and marriages.
In 2015, following its first UPR review, Guyana voluntarily committed itself to consult on 28 recommendations of which seven related to decriminalising consensual same-sex adult sexual relations and discrimination against LGBT persons.
In 2014, Guyana indicated that it would not be able to support the UN Resolution on Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity and Expression, stating: “several of the issues addressed herein are currently the subject of deliberation by a special select committee of the National Assembly”.
In 2018, the Caribbean Court of Justice ruled that Section 153(1) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act, that lists various minor offences, including ‘wearing of female attire by men and wearing of male attire by women in any public way or place, for any improper purpose’, in unconstitutional and must be struck down from the legal code. Intersex people are subject to many challenges as they are not protected by law.
At the 73rd Session, the CEDAW Committee provided Guyana with SOGIESC-focused recommendations. The Committee noted that the Guyanese constitution prohibits discrimination on the grounds of sex and gender, and notes that there are efforts from the State party to review the Prevention of Discrimination Act, 1997 to include sexual orientation and gender identity in its definition of discrimination.
The Committee also recommended that the State party the following:
(a) to adopt legislative and policy measures to protect LBTI people from discrimination, including at work, in healthcare and by law enforcement personnel, and from hate crimes, gender-based violence, and arbitrary arrest;
(b) to investigate, prosecute and adequately punish perpetrators of harm, and to provide safe spaces, support, and reparation, including compensation, to victims.
It also noted the ongoing development of training tools for healthcare workers on stigma and discrimination against LBT people but is concerned that they are not protected by the law in case of physical and sexual violence.
There was also concern at delays in adopting legislation protecting LBTI people from discrimination at work and in health-care facilities, hate crimes, gender-based violence and arbitrary arrest by law enforcement officers. The Committee also expressed its concern about the acts of violence against lesbian and bisexual women and transgender people.

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) rights in Canada are some of the most advanced in the world. In July 2005, Canada became one of the first four countries to legalize same-sex marriage. Canadian law also provides for legal adoption for same-sex couples.
Intersex people in Canada have no recognition of their rights to physical integrity and bodily autonomy, and no specific protections from discrimination on the basis of sex characteristics.
Transgender rights in Canada, including procedures for changing legal gender and protections from discrimination, vary between provinces — therefore, trans people do not have full legal recognition.
In 2011, Canada was part of a joint statement delivered to the United Nations Human Rights Council, on behalf of 85 countries, for “ending acts of violence and related human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity”.
Canada received a SOGIESC-focused recommendation from the CEDAW Committee at the 65th Session. The Committee asked the State party to develop a comprehensive national gender strategy, policy, and action plan to address the structural factors that continue to cause inequalities with respect to LBTI people, amongst a range of constituencies.
Secondly, the Committee asked Canada to strengthen the implementation of gender equality policies at the provincial and territorial levels, to ensure that all government bodies involved receive sustained guidance and support in their implementation efforts, including sufficient human, technical and financial resources.

There is a plethora of discrimination, abuse, violence, and harassment against lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in Barbados. Same-sex acts and conduct are criminalised.
Chapter 154, Section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act criminalises consensual “buggery” in public and private spaces. In August 2020, the Barbados Parliament passed the Employment (Prevention of Discrimination) Act, 2020, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, marital status, and domestic partnership status, among other grounds.
Therefore, LB women are protected from discrimination under its labour laws in Barbados. There is no legal framework for the protection of transgender and intersex people’s rights.
At the 67th Session, the CEDAW Committee provided for a number of observations for the LBTI communities in Barbados.
It asked the State party to improve access to information on sexual and reproductive health and rights for LBTI women and girls and train medical personnel to respond to their specific health needs and showed concern at the limited amount of information available on these subjects for the constituencies.
The Committee also recommended that Barbados ensures equal rights and opportunities for women who face intersecting forms of discrimination, in particular migrant women, women belonging to religious minority groups, and LBT women.
This was in response to the Committee’s concern at the absence of anti-discrimination legislation that prohibits intersecting forms of discrimination for LBTI people.
The List of Issues did not contain LBTI-inclusive questions.

Lesbian, bisexual, trans, and intersex (LBTI) people in Pakistan are systematically marginalised. Consensual same-sex conduct is criminalised under Section 377 of the Pakistan Penal Code; and continues to be prohibited as ‘sexual intercourse outside of marriage’ according to Section 4 of the Hudood Ordinance, and therefore, criminalised.
Before 2018, transgender people did not have legal recognition of their rights, but this changed after the introduction and adoption of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act. The Act allows transgender people to self-identify and bans discrimination and violence against them.
The Act wrongly defines intersex people within the definition of “transgender” and does not provide specific legal protections required for intersex people.
The CEDAW Committee’s Concluding Observations to Pakistan in 2013 did not contain any SOGIESC-focused recommendations. Pakistan received its first SOGIESC recommendations only in 2020. In the 75th Session and subsequent Concluding Observations, the Committee made references to only transgender and intersex people.
The Committee welcomed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, which recognises the right of persons to self-identify, and prohibits discrimination and harassment of transgender and intersex people.
The Committee expressed the concern about non-consensual surgery enforced upon intersex people to “correct their biological sex” and how this affects their access to justice.
The List of Issues did not contain any SOGIESC-specific recommendations.

Singapore’s legal framework oppresses lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people. Consensual same-sex conduct is illegal in public or private through Section 377A of the Penal Code that criminalises acts of “gross indecency” between men, or the procurement or attempted procurement thereof, with a penalty of up to two years imprisonment. Efforts to repeal this law are ongoing.
On 25 January 2020, the Singapore Court of Appeal heard arguments challenging the constitutionality of Section 377A; the High Court rejected these challenges in April 2020. Same-sex marriages and civil unions continue to be illegal.
There is no constitutional provision or legislation that stops discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
Since 1973, transgender people in Singapore can change their legal gender on identity cards, but not on birth certificates; the latter requires undergoing gender-confirming surgery. Intersex people have no policy or legislation that gives them legal recognition.
In 2017 at the 68th Session, the CEDAW Committee provided a single SOGIESC-focused recommendation to Singapore — it was based on Singapore’s deep culture of discrimination against LBTI people.
The Committee recommended Singapore to ensure that LBTI people are protected against all forms of discrimination in law and in practice, including by undertaking educational and awareness-raising campaigns to combat discriminatory stereotypes, including in its media policies.
The List of Issues contained an LBTI-inclusive question that may have spurred this recommendation - “Has a comprehensive strategy been adopted where there has been a modification or elimination of patriarchal attitudes and stereotypes that discriminate against women, including those based on sexual orientation and gender identity?”

Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people in the Maldives face violence, hate crimes, and discrimination due to a lack of legal protection. Consensual same-sex conduct is illegal, and there are heavy punitive measures for LBTI people.
Section 411 of the Penal Code refers to “unlawful sexual intercourse” and explicitly prohibits same-sex sexual intercourse, and Section 410 sets out punishments for “offences against the family” and bans same-sex marriages and/or civil unions.
In 2011, the Maldives voted against the adoption of Resolution 17/19, the first SOGI resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council, which requested the OHCHR to produce the first report on sexual orientation and gender identity.
In 2016, the Maldives also voted against the adoption of Resolution 32/2 which created the mandate of the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The rights of transgender and intersex people are not legally recognised nor explicitly protected. The CEDAW Committee’s Concluding Observations to the Maldives in 2015 did not contain any SOGIESC-focused recommendations.
The Committee provided other recommendations that may be applied to LBTI people:
(a) to expedite the adoption of the maternal and child health bill and improve SRHR services for all women;
(b) to adopt specific legislation to criminalise marital rape, and establish a system to support victims of domestic violence with counselling, rehabilitation, shelter, and access to justice;
(c) to strengthen the implementation of the Prevention of Human Trafficking Act, collect information and data on trafficking and victims, and provide them with support to healthcare, exit programmes, and other opportunities.
During the 80th Session, however, the Committee provided two rights-affirming recommendations. Firstly, it expressed its concern at the lack of policies in the State Party to combat the discrimination faced by disadvantaged groups of women due to the intersection with other factors leading to social exclusion, such as ethnicity, religion, nationality, disability, migrant status or membership in the lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex community. (under the section Disadvantaged groups of women). Secondly, the Committee also recommended that the state party (a) adopt all necessary measures, including temporary special measures, to combat the intersectional discrimination that disadvantaged groups of women encounter, such as migrant women, women with disabilities, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons, and women professing religions other than Islam, in relation to all aspects covered by the Convention; (b) Modify its legislation and policies in order to eliminate the forced sterilization of persons in the State Party and ensure the full and informed consent of all persons to all medical procedures, and (c) Decriminalize consensual relations between women.

CEDAW Committee's approach towards LBTI people in the Maldives has changed from 'No recognition of LBTI rights under the Convention' to 'Rights affirming reading for LBTI constituencies under the convention' for the following reasons:
Lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people live in increasingly punitive conditions in Malaysia. Consensual same-sex conduct and acts are considered a crime in Malaysia, according to sections 377A and 377B that prohibits “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” with a penalty of up to twenty years imprisonment and whipping. This is exacerbated by Sharia law within the country.
Same-sex unions and marriages are banned in Malaysia; transgender people do not have legal recognition; in fact, under Sharia laws, a number of Malaysian states criminalise tasyabbuh (a man “posing” as a woman and vice versa).
There is also no framework to protect intersex people’s rights.
Malaysia received several SOGIESC-specific recommendations from the CEDAW Committee at the 68th Session. The Committee urged the State party to adopt anti-bullying policies, strategies, counselling, and awareness-raising to foster equal rights for LBTI students who face prejudice and stigma.
They also suggested removing all barriers to healthcare for transgender women, amongst others. Specifically for LBTI human rights defenders, the Committee asked Malaysia to institute mechanisms so that they can undertake their work, without fear or threat of violence.
Lastly and most importantly, the Committee asked Malaysia to exercise substantive equality by amending all laws so that they are inclusive of LBTI people, and to address the violence and discrimination they face by discontinuing all policies that are aimed at “correcting” or rehabilitating them.

Australia has been very receptive towards the protection of the rights of lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) people. The Human Rights (Sexual Conduct) Act 1994 legalised sexual activity between consenting adults throughout Australia and prohibited laws that arbitrarily interfere with the sexual conduct of adults in private.
The State party legalised same-sex marriage in December 2017. States and territories began granting domestic partnership benefits and relationship recognition to same-sex couples from 2003 onwards, with federal law recognising same-sex couples since 2009 as de facto relationships.
Transgender people have legal recognition of their identity, and intersex people are also protected from discrimination since 2013 under the Sex Discrimination (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Act, with additional protection provided under the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986, Fair Work Act 2009, Human Rights (Sexual Conduct) Act 1994.
The CEDAW Committee provided its first SOGIESC-focused rights-affirming observations to Australia at the 70th Session. The Committee recommended that a holistic strategy is required to address negative socio-cultural patterns in public and private spheres, which will help towards protecting LBTI people from gender-based violence. It also stated that barriers to accessing healthcare, especially SRHR should be removed for LBTI people.
It noted that medical procedures on intersex infants and children should be halted till they reach an age where they can provide free and informed consent. Counselling and other forms of remedies must be made available to victims who have been subjected to unnecessary medical procedures.
The Committee used an intersectional lens to state that discriminatory stereotypes of gender roles should be challenged and indigenous LBTI people’s rights should be protected.
Another recommendation was to address the mental health situation of LBTI women and girls and reinforce preventative measures and allocate adequate funding to the national disability insurance scheme.
The Committee wanted Australia to guarantee the rights of transgender women to bodily integrity, autonomy, and self-determination and abolish requirements regarding medical treatment for transgender women who wish to obtain legal recognition of their gender.
Lastly, the Committee noted the impact of harassment and bullying on women and girls in school environments and how this exposes them to many intersecting forms of discrimination; it acknowledged the amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, prohibiting discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status, in 2013.

Lesbian, bisexual, trans, and intersex (LBTI) people are subject to a wide range of human rights violations in Mauritius, despite reported positive developments. Consensual same-sex relationships are illegal in Mauritius - Section 250 of the Mauritius Penal Code of 1838 states that “any person who is guilty of the crime of sodomy ... shall be liable to penal servitude for a term not exceeding 5 years.”
The rights of trans and intersex people are neither explicitly recognised nor protected under the law in Mauritius. A few positive developments in Mauritius regarding LBTI rights came in the form of (a) the State party supported the United Nations Human Rights Council resolution (A/HRC/17/19) affirming the rights of LGBT people in June 2011;
(b) adopting the Equal Opportunities Act 2008, and setting up the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Equal Opportunities Tribunal; (c)removing the ban against gay and lesbian people donating blood following a complaint at the Equal Opportunities Commission, and allied mediation procedures with government authorities.
The State party received its first SOGIESC - specific recommendation from the CEDAW Committee at the 71st Session. The Committee welcomed the inclusion of ‘sexual orientation’ into the Equal Opportunities Act, which seeks to prohibit direct and indirect discrimination based on ‘sex’ in education and employment.
The Committee indicated its concern regarding the growing discrimination against LBTI people, the underreporting of violence and abuse faced by them, and the lack of policy measures pertaining to their rights. It was recommended that the State party adopt specific legal and policy measures to address and eliminate the discrimination and abuse through awareness-raising, especially for medical personnel, police, and law enforcement; and provision of access to shelters and support for survivors of violence.
The List of Issues did not have any SOGIESC-specific questions, but there was an inquiry on measures to address stereotypes against women.
For the 79th Session, however, the CEDAW Committee provided no SOGIESC-specific recommendation. This is despite the fact that the list of issues contained an LBTI-specific issue - a request to specify measures taken to address the stereotyped portrayal of women, including women belonging to minority groups, migrant women, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons.
The Committee provided a useful but non-SOGIESC-specific recommendation i) putting in place temporary special measures, with a view to achieving substantive equality between women and men in all areas covered by the Convention in which women are underrepresented or disadvantaged, such as participation in political and public life and in employment; ii) ensuring that its existing data collection systems disaggregate data by sex, age, disability, ethnicity, location and socioeconomic status.
It further recommended that the State party enhance the collection, analysis and dissemination of comprehensive and disaggregated data through a centralized system and use measurable indicators to assess progress achieved towards the realization of substantive equality between women and men in all areas covered by the Convention, in particular on gender-based violence against women, child marriage, adolescent pregnancy, education, employment, women in prostitution and trafficking. In that regard, the Committee drew attention to its general recommendation No. 9 (1989) on statistical data concerning the situation of women and encouraged the State party to seek technical assistance from the relevant United Nations agencies

CEDAW Committee’s approach towards LBTI people in Mauritius has been previously categorised as 'Complete endorsement of LBTI rights under the Convention' for the following reasons:
Historically, South Africa’s movement for lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) rights occurred within the context of and in relation to broader social movements, including, most notably, the movement to end apartheid. Violence and discrimination against LBTI individuals take place within the context of extreme gender-based violence in South Africa.
Consensual same-sex conduct was decriminalised in 1998 in the National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice case. Common-law sodomy crimes “commission of an unnatural sexual act”, as well as Section 20A of the Sexual Offences Act, were held unconstitutional.
Same-sex unions have been recognised as legal under the Civil Union Act, 2006. The decision of the Constitutional Court in the case of Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie on 1 December 2005 extended the common-law definition of marriage to include same-sex spouses — as the Constitution of South Africa guarantees equal protection before the law to all citizens regardless of sexual orientation.
South Africa protects its LBTI people from discrimination and hate crimes; Section 9 of the Constitution forbids discrimination on the basis of sex, gender, or sexual orientation.
Tansgender people have found legal recognition through the Alteration of Sex Description and Sex Status Act, 2003 that allows people to apply to have their sex status altered in the population registry, and consequently to receive identity documents and passports indicating their gender identity. The law requires the person to have undergone medical or surgical treatment, such as hormone replacement therapy (sex reassignment surgery is not required).
The Act recognises intersex people and prohibits discrimination against them; however, it does not protect their physical integrity and bodily autonomy.
The CEDAW Committee provided SOGIESC-specific recommendations to South Africa at the 48th Session.
The Committee noted that there were several reported cases of sexual offences and murder as well as “corrective rapes” of lesbians. The Committee recommended that the State party abide by its constitutional provisions and provide effective protection from violence and discrimination, through the enactment of comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation that centres SOGIESC rights, and that the State party continues to raise awareness through campaigns on these issues.
The List of Issues from 2020 for South Africa has LBTI-inclusive questions that use an intersectional lens. The questions asked were about whether any initiatives and programmes exist to tackle sexual offences against lesbian women and girls, and how, if at all, the reported cases of murder of lesbian women have been investigated and addressed by the criminal justice system. The Committee also asked to provide disaggregated statistical data on women facing violence based on their gender, sex, and sexual orientation.
In the 80th Session, the CEDAW Committee strengthened its previous recommendations. It welcomed progress through The National Intervention Strategy for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) Sector, which is aimed at responding to and preventing gender-based violence against LGBTI persons, in 2014. The Committee indicated concern regarding the particularly high risk of gender-based violence against women and girls facing intersecting forms of discrimination, such as lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons, refugee women, women with disabilities and women and girls with albinism.
The Committee also urged that the State party raise awareness of women's human rights among traditional and community leaders and the general public, with the active participation of women's organizations and women human rights defenders, and on the specific risk of gender-based violence for women and girls facing intersecting forms of discrimination, such as lesbian, bisexual and transgender women; migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking women; women living with disabilities; and women and girls with albinism. It also recommended that the State party raise awareness amongst women, including women belonging to ethnic minorities, women with disabilities, migrant women, and lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, about the legal remedies available to them in the event of discrimination;
Lastly, the Committee spoke about the LBTI communities as 'Disadvantaged groups of women. The Committee noted with concern that information received on the situation of women and girls facing intersecting forms of discrimination, including lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons, migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking women, women living with HIV/AIDS, women with disabilities and women with albinism, and the lack of data on measures taken by the State party to comply with its due diligence obligation to prevent and protect these women from gender-based violence.
6. The Committee recommends that the State party provide information in its next periodic report on the situation of women facing intersecting forms of discrimination, including lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and intersex persons, migrant, refugee and asylum-seeking women, women living with HIV/AIDS, women with disabilities and women with albinism, and on measures taken to address such discrimination.

CEDAW Committee’s approach towards LBTI people in South Africa has Complete endorsement of LBTI rights under the convention for the following reasons:
The lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LBTI) community in Sri Lanka is heavily discriminated against. Those who challenge gender norms in Sri Lanka often face a range of abuses from state and non-state actors that compromise the quality and safety of their daily lives, and their ability to access services that are central to their realising basic human rights.
Sections 365 and 365A of the Sri Lankan Penal Code prohibit “carnal knowledge against the order of nature” and “gross indecency,” commonly understood in Sri Lanka to criminalise same-sex relations between consenting adults, in public and private spaces.
There are no specific laws that explicitly criminalise transgender people; however, under Section 399 and 402 of the Penal Code 1883 'cheating by personation' is punishable with imprisonment and it criminalises transgender people.
Sri Lanka does not provide any legal recourse to transgender people to change their legal identity. There is no protection framework for intersex people.
In 2016, the Health Ministry of Sri Lanka issued policy guidelines for medical professionals on procedures for changing gender identity. Although the policy guidelines do not mandate sex reassignment surgery for gender recognition, challenges still continue with regard to their implementation.
In 2016, Sri Lanka was one of two countries where consensual same-sex acts are criminalised (another one was Kiribati) that voted against dissolving the mandate of the UN Independent Expert on violence and discrimination based on SOGI.
The Committee provided SOGIESC-focused recommendations to Sri Lanka at the 66th Session. The Committee noted that the State party’s Constitutional Assembly included sexual orientation and gender identity as a ground for non-discrimination to clarify that discrimination based on sexual orientation is prohibited under the right to equality.
They were concerned about the criminalisation of same-sex relationships and how that results in women being completely excluded from legal protection, especially in the implementation of the Domestic Violence Act, and how often law enforcement officers are allowed to arbitrarily detain them.
The Committee urged the State party to decriminalise consensual same-sex relationships, and abide by the obligation of non-discrimination under the Convention.
Sri Lanka is the only country in the Commonwealth against whom the Committee is reviewing an individual complaint about the criminalisation of consensual same-sex conduct between females as part of the complaints procedure under the CEDAW Optional Protocol.
In March 2022, in a landmark decision by the CEDAW Committee, Sri Lanka was found to be violating the rights of a lesbian and leading LGBTI activist who was subjected to discrimination, threats and abuses due to the country's Penal Code that criminalises same-sex sexual activity.
The case was brought in by Rosanna Flamer-Caldera, the Executive Director of Equal Ground (a member of the TCEN), a primary LGBT organisation in Sri Lanka; and set a major legal precedent, holding that the criminalisation of lesbian and bisexual women violates the CEDAW Convention.
The CEDAW Committee stated that 'Sri Lankan authorities have subjected Ms Flamer-Caldera to gender-based discrimination and violence, and had not taken any legal or other measures to respect and protect her right to a life free from gender-based violence, or to eliminate the prejudices to which she has been exposed as a woman, lesbian and activist.'
As a part of this judgment, the Committee urged Sri Lanka to decriminalise same-sex activity, and also to take immediate and effective action to put an end to threats, harassment and abuse.

CEDAW Committee's approach towards LBTI people in Sri Lanka has been categorised as 'Complete endorsement of LBTI rights under the convention'. This is a change from its previous categorisation as 'Rights-affirming reading for LBTI constituencies under the convention' and this is because the March 2022 decision sets a landmark precedent for LBTI people's rights in Asia, and urges the state to decriminalise same-sex conduct.